Thursday, August 9, 2007: 5:00 PM-6:30 PM
Exhibit Halls 1 and 2, San Jose McEnery Convention Center
PS 68 - Restoration methods
PS 68-188		The role of power (β) in restoration monitoring Linnea A. Spears-Lebrun, EDAW, Inc.
PS 68-189		The importance of genetic diversity in riparian restoration Randy Bangert, Northern Arizona University, Gery Allan, Northern Arizona University, Sharon Ferrier, Northern Arizona University, Laura Hagenhauer, Northern Arizona University, Karla Kennedy, Northern Arizona University, Thomas Whitham, Northern Arizona University
PS 68-190		Forward to the past; removal of non-native animals from Channel Islands National Park Kate Roney Faulkner, National Park Service, Russell Galipeau, National Park Service
PS 68-191		Assessing rehabilitation success 30 years on. The case of hydroelectric developments in Tasmania, Australia Anita S. Wild, Hydro Tasmania Consulting
PS 68-192		The effects of Elymus virginicus seeding versus weed-control fabric on the recovery of native vegetation in an urban restoration project Jacoba M. Charles, Columbia University, Matthew I. Palmer, Columbia University
PS 68-193		Improving restoration of native habitats: DELLA response plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana as an approach for defining appropriate genotypes for stressful conditions Carolyn Norin, Rutgers University, Steven N. Handel, Rutgers University
PS 68-194		Effectiveness of transplanting vs. seeding of Lupinus perennis in an oak savanna regeneration site Helen J. Michaels, Bowling Green State University, Mark K. St. Mary, Bowling Green State University
PS 68-195		Estimating the soil water resources needed for revegetation, using Baccharis pilularis Matthew J. Curtis, University of California, Davis, Victor P. Claassen, University of California, Davis
PS 68-196		Ground water restoration at abandoned uranium mills on the Navajo Nation using native, desert phreatophytes William J. Waugh, S. M. Stoller Corporation, Edward P. Glenn, University of Arizona, Fiona Jordan, University of Arizona
PS 68-197		Carbon addition to soils as a tool for restoration and research: A meta-analysis Karen A. Haubensak, Indiana University, Kimberly A. Allcock, University of Nevada - Reno, William B. Mattingly, Indiana University, Barbara Swedo, Indiana University, Lauren M. Young, Indiana University, Heather L. Reynolds, Indiana University
PS 68-198		Resource enhancement techniques to aid shrub transplant success in an arid shrubland restoration Tamera J. Minnick, Mesa State College, Richard D. Alward, Aridlands Natural Resource Consulting, Julia S. Christiansen, Mesa State College, Kay F. Lambert, Mesa State College, Kate H. Burden, Mesa State College
PS 68-199		Environmental factors assessment of the Station of Ecologic Restoration in Barrancas del Río Tembembe, central Mexico Juana García-Flores, Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, Jorge López-Blanco, Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, María del C. Bonfil- Sanders, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Rosa I. Trejo-Vázquez, Instituto de Geografía, UNAM
PS 68-200		Restoration of vernal pool, quino checkerspot, and burrowing owl regional habitat in Otay Mesa, California Jesper Pietsch, EDAW Inc
PS 68-202		Facilitating recovery of a long-disturbed maritime chaparral site in Santa Barbara County Tamara A. Klug, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), Carpinteria CA, Rosemary A. Thompson, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), Carpinteria CA, Thomas W. Mulroy, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), Carpinteria CA

See more of Contributed Oral and Poster Abstracts

See more of The ESA/SER Joint Meeting (August 5 -- August 10, 2007)