COS 13-9 - Size matters: Examining patterns of maximum body size of mammals over time and space

Monday, August 3, 2009: 4:20 PM
Grand Pavillion IV, Hyatt
Felisa A. Smith1, Alison G. Boyer2, James H. Brown1, Daniel P. Costa3, Tamar Dayan4, Alistair Evans5, S.K. Morgan Ernest6, Mikael Fortelius7, Larisa E. Harding1, Kari Lintulaakso7, S. Kathleen Lyons8, Richard Sibly9, Juha Saarinen7, Jessica Theodor10 and Mark Uhen11, (1)Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, (2)Environmental Sciences Division & Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, (3)Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, (4)Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, (5)School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia, (6)Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, (7)Department of Geology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, (8)Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC, DC, (9)Biological Science, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom, (10)Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, (11)Alabama Museum of Natural History, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
Background/Question/Methods Macroecologists often focus on body size as a factor of interest because it serves as a proxy for many different aspects of an organism's biology. Size results from a complex and dynamic tradeoff between physiology, life history, environment, phylogenetic constraints, and past geologic and/or climatic history. Nonetheless, certain ‘invariant' size-dependent scaling relationships and broad-scale distributional patterns are repeatedly observed for mammals and other taxa. Do these patterns arise because of common ancestry, because organisms exist in similar environments, or because they face similar design or life history constraints? To examine these questions, we assembled a database of maximum body size for the major orders found on each continent (North and South America, Africa, Eurasia and Australia) over the evolutionary history of mammals (late Mesozoic to Recent). Maximum size was chosen because of taphonomic issues involved in characterizing minimum or mean/median size. Our temporal resolution is at the epoch or sub-epoch level (e.g., early, mid or late Miocene); data were collected from a number of primary and secondary sources and/or estimated directly from taxon-specific allometric regressions based on measurements of fossil teeth or limbs. Results/Conclusions Overall, our results clearly demonstrate a rapid increase in the body size morphospace of mammals over the Cenozoic, reflecting the evolutionary radiation that occurred after the extinction of dinosaurs and other groups at the K/T boundary. We find remarkable consistency in the maximum size achieved over time on each continent, as well as that achieved by various groups of the same guild, although geologic factors influence the distribution of orders among the continents. We also see interesting interchanges over time with some groups replaced by ecologically similar but phylogenetically distinct orders that appear to occupy the same body size niche. Our results indicate the presence of “body size niches” that are filled repeatably over evolutionary time.
Copyright © . All rights reserved.
Banner photo by Flickr user greg westfall.