COS 40-7 - Evolutionary and biogeographic history constrain ecological convergence in alpine plant communities: A global comparison

Tuesday, August 9, 2011: 4:00 PM
9AB, Austin Convention Center
Brad Butterfield , Merriam Powell Center, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ
Lohengrin A. Cavieres , Universidad de Concepción, Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB), Concepción, Chile
Ragan M. Callaway , Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
Rob W. Brooker , Ecology Group, The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Bradley J. Cook , Department of Biological Sciences, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Mankato, MN
Zaal Kikvidze , University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Chris Lortie , Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada
Richard Michalet , UMR 1202 INRA-Bordeaux 1 University, BIOGECO laboratory, Talence, France
Francisco I. Pugnaire , Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Almería, Spain
Christian Schoeb , Estacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Almeria, Spain
Alfonso Valiente-Banuet , Instituto de Ecologia, UNAM, Mexico
Sa Xiao , School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
Background/Question/Methods

Convergence of form and function under similar environmental conditions has intrigued biologists for centuries.  At the same time, phylogenetic conservatism has emerged as a general principal, suggesting that evolutionary constraints may limit the extent of convergence.  These observations lead to the question “How has the balance of evolutionary history and environmental selection shaped species’ niches”?  We addressed this question with respect to biotic interactions in alpine plant communities across 5 continents.  Specifically, we studied the effects of “cushion” plants – a convergent growth form that has evolved independently many times during angiosperm evolution – on the structure and diversity of the entire community.  Cushion plants generally facilitated co-occurring species, however this effect varied substantially across communities and environmental gradients.  In an attempt to further explain this variation in community structure, we tested the hypotheses that the outcome of biotic interactions is influenced by (1) phylogenetic conservatism in cushion effects (Effect Conservatism), (2) phylogenetic conservatism in non-cushion species responses (Response Conservatism), and (3) relatedness between the cushion species and the rest of the community (Phylogenetic Repulsion).

Results/Conclusions

There was weak support for effect conservatism of cushion plants, with a phylogenetic signature of cushion effects (i.e. mean relative interaction intensity, or RII, at the community level) less than but not significantly different from a Brownian motion model of trait evolution.  Furthermore, RII was not at all conserved across the non-cushion phylogeny, providing no support for the response conservatism hypothesis.  However, the phylogenetic repulsion hypothesis was strongly supported by a positive relationship between mean RII and the mean phylogenetic distance from the cushion species to the non-cushion species within a community.  In other words, cushions that were closely related to the rest of the community tended to have competitive effects, whereas cushion species that were distantly related to the rest of the community had facilitative effects.  Our results suggest that niche overlap between dominant species and the rest of the community strongly influences community structure, and the degree of niche overlap is in turn influenced by the biogeographic and evolutionary history of the regional species pool.  We further explore the biogeographic patterns of cushion plant evolution and the role of adaptive radiations in determining community structure in alpine plant communities.

Copyright © . All rights reserved.
Banner photo by Flickr user greg westfall.