Thursday, August 9, 2007: 3:40 PM
C3&4, San Jose McEnery Convention Center
Using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Refuge System
as a case study, we examine the policy implications of examining landscape
context. Spatial analysis of the refuge system shows the system to be
susceptible in a number of ways. The vast majority are small, much smaller than
the ecological processes that maintain them. Refuges lands are primarily
shrublands, grasslands and wetlands, but the lands surrounding refuges are
largely agricultural. Revisions to the refuge system management through the
Refuge Improvement Act of 1997 provides guidance for management within and
outside refuges, but specific case studies show federal managers are taking a
careful, if not timid, approach when it comes to entering into the fray of
management issues outside refuge boundaries. We use this case study to show how
land managers might use spatial analysis to rank priorities, and how their
policy and regulatory policies may shift if large-area context is
considered.