Monday, August 4, 2008 - 3:20 PM

COS 8-6: Detecting competition at the stand level using distance and size correlations of tree crowns

Stephan Getzin and Kerstin Wiegand. University of Jena

Background/Question/Methods
The detection and quantification of competition at the stand level is important in forest management because competition reduces growth and increases the risk of mortality. This is of interest for timber production where efficient tools of forest inventory are increasingly demanded. Especially modern planning of thinning based on aerial or satellite images requires a spatially explicit understanding of the growth dynamics of tree crowns relative to the dynamics of stems. Past studies have evaluated competition in forests with scale-dependent correlation functions applied to stem-base positions or to tree-size attributes (continuous marks) such as diameter at breast height or tree height. However, very few studies have analyzed the correlation of distances between tree crowns. Despite the fast reaction of foliage to changes of neighborhood density in the canopy, horizontal crown extent has apparently not been used in such competition analyses of marked point patterns. Here we investigated in a spatially explicit approach the distance and size correlations of tree crowns under neighborhood competition. Crown patterns and respective distance correlations of crown centroids were analyzed with the pair-correlation function. The formation of crown-size patterns under competition was analyzed with the mark-correlation function (MCF) applied to the marks ‘crown area’ of all live trees, and ‘upper crown area’ of overstory trees. These analyses were conducted for two deciduous and two coniferous forests in central Germany.
Results/Conclusions
Unlike the dominating random patterns of uncorrelated crown centroids, crown areas were very sensitive for the detection of competition. In relation to ‘crown area’ of all trees in a plot, this sensitivity was greater when only the mark ‘upper crown area’ of overstory trees was analyzed. Both, the strength and the spatial range of negative size correlation were greater for upper crowns. These upper crown areas showed a finite range of negative interaction of about six meters. Additionally, the temporal change in density-dependent effects was well described with the MCF when orthophotos of a Douglas-fir stand were compared between 2002 and 2005. These results demonstrate that 1.) the ‘functional growing space’ of large and light-exposed canopy trees is highly suitable to detect competition and 2.) the spatial range and strength of competition can be assessed and differentiated between stands in a spatially explicit manner. Our application may have practical value for monitoring competition based on remotely sensed forest inventory because upper crown areas as seen by the ‘bird-eye’s view’ were most sensitive for detecting competition in stands.