Results/Conclusions Preliminary findings indicate that areas dominated by Tamarix had significantly higher levels of soil salinity than areas with mixed (cottonwood and Tamarix) or native vegetation canopies. At this time, it is assumed that decadent or older Tamarix stands may have already altered the soil too much to make restoration feasible. Our initial findings, however, show that these decadent stands have the lowest salt levels and therefore seem more conducive to native riparian vegetation growth. Preliminary results also suggest that while flooding does mitigate the impact of Tamarix on salt-loading, salinity levels are higher on average in Tamarix-invaded areas when compared with sites dominated by natives. Identification of patterns between Tamarix stand characteristics and soil and groundwater chemistry could have important implications for riparian habitat restoration following Tamarix removal. This research provides a unique opportunity to quantify the effects of an invasive species on an ecosystem, and will be used to assist in identifying revegetation potential for riparian areas infested by Tamarix. Prioritization of restoration efforts will likely ensure the proper allocation of funds to areas of greatest concern and of greatest potential for revegetation.