PS 3-49 - Soil type mediates soil respiration response to a CO2 gradient in tallgrass prairie

Monday, August 4, 2008
Exhibit Hall CD, Midwest Airlines Center
Andrew Procter1, Alexia M. Kelley2, Philip A. Fay3, Virginia L. Jin4, H. Wayne Polley3 and Rob Jackson5, (1)Duke University, Durham, NC, (2)Forestry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, (3)Grassland, Soil & Water Research Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Temple, TX, (4)Agroecosystem Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Lincoln, NE, (5)School of Earth Sciences, Stanford and Duke universities, Stanford, CA
Background/Question/Methods Changes in soil respiration due to rising atmospheric CO2 have large  implications for land-atmosphere carbon balance and consequently the greenhouse effect.  We report results from tallgrass prairie exposed to a gradient of CO2 spanning preindustrial to expected mid-century levels (250 - 500ppm).  Elongated chambers are used to expose soil monoliths planted to tallgrass prairie species to a CO2 gradient.  Three soil series are represented along  the CO2 gradient:  Austin (mollisol), Bastrop (alfisol), and Houston (vertisol).  Soil respiration was measured monthly with an infrared gas analyzer during the 2007 growing season (April – October).
Results/Conclusions Soil respiration responded positively to CO2 treatment on all soils.  The response of respiration to CO2 was linear in Bastrop and Houston soils (p < 0.05), but non-linear in Austin soil.  Interestingly, of the three soils, Houston and Austin are most similar in texture.  There is likely a seasonal dimension to the soil type x CO2 interaction.  Early in the growing season (May), linear regressions of respiration rate vs CO2 treatment were not significant, but in July and October were significant (p < 0.05).  Averaged across the 2007 growing season, respiration rates were highest on Houston soil and lowest on Austin soil, with Bastrop soil intermediate (8.38, 6.80, and 7.40 μmol CO2/m2/s, respectively).  Soil respiration responses, when combined with results on photosynthesis and plant productivity, will allow better characterization of prairie as a C sink or source under future CO2 levels.
Copyright © . All rights reserved.
Banner photo by Flickr user greg westfall.