Results/Conclusions In general, coastal plants experienced less water stress than inland plants on similar slopes; predawn and midday water potentials were -0.375 ±0.18 MPa higher, dark-adapted fluorescence (Fv/Fm) was typically 5% higher, and stomatal conductance was typically 50 % higher for coastal trees compared to inland trees. It is now believed that although coastal plants received a less rainfall than inland plants, the greater humidity and moderate temperatures allowed the coastal plants to maintain higher water potentials, Fv/Fm, and stomatal conductance. Trees on south-facing slopes experienced significantly less water stress than their north-facing counterparts, with pre-dawn water potentials -0.26 ±0.16 MPa higher, Fv/Fm 3% higher, but stomatal conductance 27.3% higher for trees on south-facing slopes versus north-facing slopes. Midday water potentials were also greater for south-facing slopes versus north-facing slopes in the summer and fall. Although establishment on the south-facing slope may be difficult due to exposure to sun competition for water appears to be a greater for established plants on north-facing slopes because, in general, plant frequency and groundcover are greater on north-facing slopes than for south-facing slopes.