Urban trees are increasingly being valued for their economical contributions based on the environmental functions they provide to urban ecosystems. Based on 2002 data, total value for urban forests in the U.S. was estimated at $2.4 trillion. Forest value increases when a greater proportion of forest trees are healthy with large diameters yet, maintaining urban tree longevity is met with a vast array of challenges (e.g. diverse management, limited root space, soil compaction, etc.). Although maximizing tree growth is recognized as a critical urban forestry objective, few forest health preservation programs exist. Including urban soil function and integrating urban soils into forest management can help managers understand the effects of tree management decisions. This study tested for the presence of feedbacks between soil quality and tree health, as well as between soil quality and tree species in Chicago, IL. Samples were taken from an area of approximately 4,000 trees, using 36 random individuals in a blocked sampling design, accounting for health categories (good, fair, poor, dead) across the four most common tree species (Gleditsia triancanthos, Acer saccharinum, Acer platanoides, and Tilia americana). Nine soil properties were measured and statistical analysis was performed using univariate, multivariate, and geospatial statistical tests.
Results/Conclusions
No patterns were found linking any of nine soil properties to tree conditions. The same disconnection appears in krig interpolation and tree diameter maps of the study area, reinforcing the lack of condition-based soil patterns.