Results/Conclusions While qualitative forecasts may be made using models derived from theory, quantitative forecasts in complex dynamical systems require estimates of the state of the system and include parameters that must be estimated empirically. The limitations of linking forecasting to short-term or episodic data collection arise as a consequence of the lack of stationarity that exists in dynamic ecological systems. Iterative or cyclic forecasting provides a powerful approach that-in a general way-accommodates the lack of stationarity. In cyclic forecasting, a model is initialized with observations, integrated forward to produce a forecast, compared again to observations, re-initialized, and again integrated forward. A model developed over a single forecast cycle tends to explore a small subregion of the solution space, whereas models that are developed iteratively through updating can characterize a much larger region of the solution space. Iterative/cyclic forecasting can reveal patterns of error that are not evident in a single forecast cycle. For example, a model may perform well at low population densities but fail as higher densities are reached. NEON must collect and make available data on a regular schedule to enable iterative comparison of model predictions and observations, leading to an orderly forecast evaluation/update/improvement cycle.