Results/Conclusions Comparing private and communal ejidal lands, we learned that aggressive efforts to eradicate prairie dogs by private landowners resulted in a rapid yet transient increase in forage production, followed by increases in mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa), and precipitous declines in forage that threatens future livestock production. In adjacent communal lands overgrazing has removed most perennial grasses yet persistent prairie dog populations have prevented, or delayed mesquite expansion. Other experiments demonstrate that prairie dogs benefit from livestock grazing and that their interactive effects are synergistic, greatly altering flora and faunal dynamics in ways that increase landscape heterogeneity and biodiversity. Likewise, cattle show a seasonal preference for the margins of prairie dog colonies where diet quality is enhanced. Current work is attempting understand how to modulate interactive effects of livestock grazing, fire, and prairie dogs to control mesquite, and increase grassland resilience, while providing habitat for threatened grassland birds and forages for local communities. Because local communities are dependant on ecosystem management rather than simple forage and livestock management, efforts to include local youth and their families in research and remediation practices are underway and being formalized with formation of youth conservation corps that subsidizes their formal education. Others are working with local entrepreneurs reviving regional alcoholic drinks by planting native species used in their manufacture to stabilize soils and promote grass reestablishment. These and similar approaches to remediate grassland degradation while providing short- and long-term community benefits are being employed by researchers and community leaders. In the long-term, ecological literacy and development of a “land ethic” will likely be the most lasting outcomes.