Results/Conclusions: Warming by itself did not influence Asat. During the peak growing season in June, 2009, Asat averaged 19.8 (SE = 0.4) µmol m-2 s-1 in the warmed treatment plots and 18.4 (SE = 1.2) µmol m-2 s-1 in control plots. However, Asat in the elevated [CO2] treatment (12.4 [SE = 1.3] µmol m-2 s-1) was 33 and 37 % lower than in control and warmed treatment plots, respectively. Plants exposed to combined elevated [CO2] and warming had only slightly lower Asat values (17.4 [SE = 0.9] µmol m-2 s-1) compared to plants in warmed only or control treatments. These patterns of Asat were similar to those observed earlier and later in the growing season, and differences among treatments in water relations could not account for differences in Asat; plants in elevated [CO2] treatments had the highest leaf water potential values. We hypothesize that reduced Asat under elevated [CO2] is driven by non-stomatal photosynthetic limitations, and that warming nearly eliminated this down-regulation. These results will be presented in addition to an analysis of the biochemical properties explaining photosynthetic responses. The potential consequences of warming-induced photosynthetic stimulation are complex, and may ultimately depend on plant nitrogen use and nitrogen availability.