We examined how mutualistic symbionts – fungal endophytes – affect the niche of their native grass host, Bromus laevipes. We surveyed ~100 naturally occurring populations of the grass throughout California to determine frequency of endophytes. These data combined with climate data were used to generate two ecological niche models with the program MAXENT – one for symbiotic and one for non-symbiotic B. laevipes. We compared these models to determine the impact of mutualism on the geographic and climatic niches of B. laevipes.
Results/Conclusions Our results strongly suggest both geographic and climatic niche expansion of B. laevipes via mutualistic symbiosis and niche partitioning between symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants. Consistent with niche expansion, the niche models detected high suitability for symbiotic B. laevipes (E+) in California’s coastal regions that were unsuitable for non-symbiotic plants (E-). Conversely, some regions (e.g. northern Sierra Nevada foothills) were highly suitable for non-symbiotic but not symbiotic plants. Taken together, these data also suggest niche partitioning between E+ and E- B. laevipes. Mutualist-mediated niche expansion is further supported by the significantly larger niche breadth of symbiotic B. laevipes compared to non-symbiotic plants across all climatic and geographic niche axes examined (~20-65% larger niche breadth of E+ plants). Niche overlap between E+ and E- plants ranged from ~60-70%, indicating that they differ substantially in their niches (consistent with both niche expansion and partitioning). Currently, we are testing model quality by sampling endophyte status of new populations in the species range and via transplant studies that will also provide an experimental test of mutualist-mediated niche expansion/partitioning at a large geographic scale.