Results/Conclusions Our analysis shows that a set of three variables (actual evapotranspiration, AET; deficit, D; mean temperature of the coldest month, MTCO) distinguished among vegetation classes similarly or better than other common predictor variable sets. Similarly, these variables resulted in few areas of “no-analog” future climates (i.e., combinations of climate variables unlike any that exist today). In contrast, other commonly used variables resulted in a greater extent of no-analog climates, indicating the importance of using ecophysiologically meaningful variables when assessing analog conditions. In areas where analog climates existed, the projected shifts in vegetation classes were largest at the dry ends of vegetation gradients. Presettlement fire intervals were shortest in areas with a high AET (productivity) and D (summer drought), which occurred near the lower forest treeline. In a discriminant analysis where climate and presettlement fire intervals were predictors of vegetation type, fire provided no additional explanatory power with the exception of grasslands and the driest forest classes. These results show that a simple climatic water balance is a stronger predictor of major patterns of vegetation than previously shown, that historical fire explains forest boundaries in several regions, and that the presence of no-analog climatic conditions is highly sensitive to the set of variables employed.