Results/Conclusions
Preliminary results indicate that both nitrate and phosphate losses in stream waters are significantly lower in Mora watersheds compared to non-Mora watersheds. Water isotope analysis indicates that hydrologic sourcing is indistinguishable between forest types, suggesting that differences in nutrient losses result from differences in external inputs or internal cycling rather than hydrology. Analysis of N and natural abundance isotopes of nitrate in rainfall suggests that atmospheric deposition may be insufficient to balance losses in either forest type, implying that biological fixation may account for differences in nutrient losses between watersheds. However, it remains unclear whether these differences can be attributed to symbiotic versus heterotrophic fixation. Results from our broader survey of rainforests in Trinidad revealed a strong positive but asymptotic relationship between phosphate and nitrate in stream losses, with Mora forests being lowest in both and nitrate increasing as a function of phosphate across forests but leveling off at the highest phosphate levels. This may imply that P availability constrains N accumulation and losses at low P levels but that something else limits N losses at higher levels of P. Results from soil analyses and micronutrient distributions will also be discussed.