Results/Conclusions Field surveys suggested that high-latitude plants should also have been of higher quality to herbivores. Leaf C:N ratio in all 3 plant species decreased toward higher latitudes, consistent with higher leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen contents at high latitudes. Leaf toughness decreased toward higher latitudes in 1 species, but not in the other two. The body size of 4 herbivore species increased with latitude, consistent with high-latitude leaves being of higher quality, while 2 grasshopper species showed the opposite pattern, likely due to life-history constraints. In the laboratory, the geographic region from which plants were collected affected herbivore performance for 4 (or 5) out of 6 herbivore species. In particular, high-latitude plants supported better herbivore performance in two sucking (aphid, planthopper) and two chewing (beetle, grasshopper) species, and tended to do so in a third chewing herbivore (grasshopper). The geographic region from which herbivores were collected affected herbivore performance in all 6 species; however, the pattern was mixed. We found no evidence for local adaptation by herbivores to plants from their own geographic region. In conclusion, our results suggest that more-palatable plants at high latitudes support better herbivore growth, and geographic origin of either plants or herbivores can affect herbivore performance.