Results/Conclusions Although there was a strong correlation between RGR740 and RGR370, we found no evidence that genotypes that grew fast at ambient CO2 had a greater relative growth response to CO2 than genotypes that grew more slowly (i.e. the slope of the linear relationship between RGR740 and RGR370 was not significantly different from one). Variation in 12 physiological and morphological traits describing differences in allocation, canopy structure, stomatal function and photosynthesis were also determined for this set of 29 genotypes. Multiple correlation analysis revealed that four of these traits, all of them related to differences in canopy structure were significantly associated with variation in RGR740. Collectively, these four traits explained 74% of the variation in RGR740, the single most important trait being the slope of the allometric relationship between plant height and stem diameter. Given that the pattern found at the intra-specific level differed from that previously reported at the inter-specific level, our results suggest differences in relative growth rate per se do not affect the growth response to CO2. Rather, the CO2 growth response is determined by traits that may or may not be correlated with relative growth rate.