Decades of fire suppression have radically altered the uplands of northern
Results/Conclusions
The intense treatment was found to harbor the highest spider diversity, a value significantly greater than that of the fire-suppressed forest and old field, but not the moderate treatment. Although treatments resulted in architecture more typical of open habitats, such as increased density of herbaceous vegetation and reduced leaf litter cover, the predicted magnitude of transitional habitat structure failed to develop. Since herbaceous vegetation existed in patches that were primarily associated with natural tree falls, it is recommended that a higher intensity of thinning be administered. A distinct difference was observed between the old field and forested habitats in respect to vegetation structure, spider community composition, and spider guild proportions. Rather than generate an intermediate spider community, the treatments resulted in a unique assemblage that shared many species with the fire-suppressed forest. This assemblage diverged from the fire-suppressed forest through changes in the proportions of shared species, loss of species, addition of unique species, and inclusion of select old field species. This study indicates that subjecting landscapes to a mosaic of fire regimes will likely enhance spider diversity through the formation of varied structural environments.