COS 28-9 - Evolution of C4 photosynthesis in grasses linked to reduction in the anatomical capacity for stomatal conductance

Tuesday, August 9, 2011: 10:50 AM
18A, Austin Convention Center
Samuel H. Taylor1, Peter J. Franks1, Stephen P. Hulme1, Elizabeth Spriggs2, Pascal-Antoine Christin3, Erika J. Edwards2, F. Ian Woodward1 and Colin P. Osborne4, (1)Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, (2)Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, (3)University of Sheffield, (4)University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
Background/Question/Methods

The evolution of C4 photosynthesis has provided C4 species with the capacity to maintain CO2 assimilation rates at a lower stomatal conductance than is commonly observed in their C3 relatives.  This key trait contributes to the water-use efficiency advantages of C4 over C3 photosynthesis, a physiological contrast that has been linked with the tendency for C4 species to occupy drier, more seasonal niche spaces.  Using experiments screening closely related C3 and C4 grass species from a range of habitats, we have demonstrated that low stomatal conductance is a common trait that distinguishes C4 grasses from their C3 relatives.  Here, we hypothesise that lower stomatal conductance in C4 species may have an anatomical underpinning rather than being driven solely by regulation of stomatal aperture.  Specifically, we propose that stomatal conductance capacity, defined by stomatal density and size, is lower in C4 species.

We measured stomatal size and density in 28 species sampled from seven grass lineages, which were placed within a phylogeny based on three plastid regions.  The phylogeny was used in a comparative analysis to test for expected evolutionary relationships between stomatal capacity, C3 and C4 photosynthesis, and the occupation of wet versus dry-mesic niches across a range of habitat precipitation values.

Results/Conclusions

Our analyses supported three hypotheses.  1) That the evolution of C4 photosynthesis has been accompanied by decreases in stomatal capacity.  2) That phylogenetic conservatism in stomatal size and density cause between-lineage differences in stomatal capacity.  3) That irrespective of photosynthetic type, species from mesic-dry habitats had lower stomatal capacity than those from wet habitats.  We found no evidence for an association between stomatal capacity and precipitation.  Our results suggest a novel example of linkage between biochemical innovation and anatomical traits in plants.  Anatomical differences in stomatal size and density are a crucial component of the reduced stomatal conductance that characterises C4 grasses.

Copyright © . All rights reserved.
Banner photo by Flickr user greg westfall.