Results/Conclusions . In the main, we found support for the idea that a decrease in a species’ specialization confers a greater potential to interact (network node size) with other members of metacommunity. However, we discovered important secondary patterns. Specifically, node size was affected differently by occupancy and niche breadth. While the node size increased at a decelerating rate in response to occupancy of a species, it showed a decline after an initial and substantial rise for all the measures of niche breadth. This seems to suggest that species with broadest niches are often decoupled from community majority. On the opposite end of the specialization spectrum, specialists showed the greatest relative variation (Coefficient of Variation) of the network node size. This implies that although specialists tend to have an appreciable node size (approximately 50% of that shown by the species in the middle of the specialization range), their potential for interaction with other species is highly unpredictable in space and time. It is not yet entirely clear how the decoupling of generalists and esoteric behavior of specialists should be incorporated into metacommunity theory and conservation practice. The results suggest however that dynamics of a metacommunity is affected by selective species sorting, partial independence of generalists (they can occur alone or with few other species), and a gradient of unpredictability inversely correlated with specialization.