COS 164-9 - Assessing the occupancy of introduced plant species in the forests of the United States

Thursday, August 9, 2012: 4:20 PM
Portland Blrm 255, Oregon Convention Center
Bethany K. Schulz, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Anchorage, AK and Andrew Gray, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station
Background/Question/Methods

Introduced plant species have significant negative impacts in many ecosystems and are found in many forests around the world. Some factors linked to the distribution of introduced species include fragmentation and disturbance, native species richness, and climatic and physical conditions of the landscape. However, there are few data sources that enable the assessment of introduced species occupancy in native plant communities over broad regions. Vegetation data from 1302 forest inventory plots across 24 states in the northeastern and mid-western U.S. were used to examine and compare the distribution of introduced species in relation to forest fragmentation across ecological provinces and forest types, and to examine correlations between native and introduced species richness.

Results/Conclusions

There were 305 introduced species recorded and 66 percent of all forested plots had at least one introduced species. Forest edge plots had higher constancy and occupancy of introduced species than intact forest plots, but the differences varied significantly among ecological provinces and, to a lesser degree, forest types. Weak but significant positive correlations between native and introduced species richness were observed most often in intact forests. Rosa multiflora was the most common introduced species recorded across the region, but Hieracium aurantiacum and Epipactus helleborine were dominant in some ecological provinces. These results are briefly compared to several other regions of the country. Identifying regions and forest types with high and low constancies and occupation by introduced species can help target forest stands where management actions will be the most effective. Identifying seemingly benign introduced species that are more prevalent than realized will help focus attention on newly emerging invasives.