COS 107-10 - Gap filling strategies for annual estimates of soil respiration

Wednesday, August 8, 2012: 4:40 PM
D139, Oregon Convention Center
Nuria Gomez-Casanovas, Institute for Genomic Biology, Energy Biosciences Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Kristina Anderson-Teixeira, Institute for Genomic Biology; Energy Biosciences Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Marcelo Zeri, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Centro de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre, Brazil, Carl J. Bernacchi, Department of Plant Biology/ Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, University of Illinois/USDA-ARS, Urbana, IL and Evan H. DeLucia, Institute for Genomic Biology, Urbana, IL
Background/Question/Methods

Soil respiration (Rsoil) is one of the largest CO2 fluxes of in the global carbon cycle. Quantifying the contribution of Rsoil to the global carbon cycle requires annual estimates integrated across large spatial scales. Rsoil records generally contain gaps. Filling data gaps is therefore requisite to accurately predict Rsoil. However, the reliability of various strategies for filling gaps in Rsoil records and scaling survey respiration measurements to an annual time scale has not yet been assessed. Here, we: 1) conducted a literature survey for gap filling strategies used to estimate annual Rsoil, and 2) evaluated the performance of different gap filling methods by analyzing the errors introduced when filling artificial gaps into annual Rsoil datasets for various ecosystem types. Gap filling methods evaluated included linear and quadratic interpolation, monthly average, and exponential temperature-dependence models assuming a) a single temperature sensitivity (E) and reference Rsoil (Rref) over the entire year, b) constant E and varying Rref, and c) varying E and Rref. Artificial gaps were introduced to the datasets at 11 gap fractions (0-95% of existing data) and in a pattern replicating bi-monthly survey measurements ( >99% “gap”) and filled using each method.

Results/Conclusions

Our literature survey analysis showed that a wide variety of gap filling methods have been used in Rsoil records. However, the linear interpolation method along with the temperature-dependence Rsoil model assuming a single E and Rref over the entire year were the gap filling methods more widely used. Our results on gap filling methods performance showed that uncertainty in annual Rsoil estimates increased along with gap fraction length. For short and medium gap fraction lengths (5-to-85% of the existing data), all gap filling strategies performed reasonably well. However, the relative differences between the different gap filling methods to predict the annual Rsoil sums were larger for longer gap fraction lengths (95 and 99% of the existing data). Taken together our results emphasize the need to standardize gap filling methods for Rsoil. We use our results to provide guidance as to which gap filling methods should be used to provide defensible annual Rsoil estimates.