PS 47-70 - Risk assessment of six marine invasion pathways into California estuaries 

Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Exhibit Hall, Oregon Convention Center
Jae Pasari1, Gail Ashton2, Ian Davidson3, Edwin D. Grosholz4, Gregory Ruiz3, Susan L. Williams5 and Chela J. Zabin6, (1)Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, (2)Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, (3)Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, (4)Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA, (5)Bodega Marine Lab, UC Davis, Bodega Bay, CA, (6)Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Tiburon, CA
Background/Question/Methods

The spread of aquatic invasive species (AIS) in marine environments is accelerating globally and continuing to cause ecological and economic damage. California is a recognized hotspot of invasion and a focal point for invasions to other locations. While the importance of ballast-mediated transfer of invasive species has been recognized for some time, there are several other under-regulated invasion pathways (vectors) introducing species into California ecosystems. Using extensive field work, examination of shipping permits, surveys, and quantitative analysis of data in literature, we characterized the impact and flux of six invasion pathways into California: recreational vessels, fishing vessels, aquaculture, aquarium/ornamental trade, live bait, and live seafood.

Results/Conclusions

We found striking differences in the volume and types of organisms associated with each vector. Furthermore, the impact types (ecological, economic, and health) associated with each vector also varied considerably. We also identified gaps in monitoring, permitting, and scientific study that hinder our understanding of impacts and the prioritization of intervention strategies among pathways.