COS 36-1
Environmental controls over bacterial communities in polar desert soils

Tuesday, August 6, 2013: 1:30 PM
101J, Minneapolis Convention Center
Kevin M. Geyer, Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Adam E. Altrichter, Biology and the Built Environment Center, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
David J. Van Horn, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Cristina Takacs-Vesbach, Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Michael N. Gooseff, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
John E. Barrett, Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Background/Question/Methods

Productivity-diversity relationships have been a major organizer of investigations seeking to understand drivers of spatial patterns in biotic communities, with relationships between resource availability and community structure documented for a wide variety of taxa.  For soil bacteria, availability of organic matter is one such resource known to influence diversity and community structure. Here we describe the influence of environmental gradients on soil bacterial communities of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica, a model ecosystem that hosts simple, microbially-dominated foodwebs believed to be primarily structured by abiotic drivers especially water, organic matter, pH, and electrical conductivity.  We sampled 48 locations exhibiting orders of magnitude ranges in primary production and soil geochemistry (pH and electrical conductivity) over local and regional scales.

Results/Conclusions

Our findings show that environmental gradients imposed by cryptogam productivity and regional variation in geochemistry influence the diversity and structure of soil bacterial communities.  Responses of soil bacterial richness to carbon content illustrate a productivity-diversity relationship, while bacterial community structure primarily responds to soil pH and electrical conductivity.  This evidence for a diversity response to resource availability, and a community structure response to environmental severity, suggests the need for consideration of how microbial communities and associated functions may respond to shifting environmental conditions resulting from human activity and climate variability.