COS 96-6
Growth, photosynthesis and cold tolerance of Eucalyptus benthamii planted in the Piedmont of North Carolina

Thursday, August 8, 2013: 9:50 AM
M100HC, Minneapolis Convention Center
Kurt H. Johnsen, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, NC
Pete Anderson, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, NC
John R. Butnor, Southern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Burlington, VT
Kevin Hall, Department of Forestry and Natural resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Joshua M. Halman, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
Gary J. Hawley, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
Chris A. Maier, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, NC
Paul G. Schaberg, USDA Forest Service, Burlington, VT
Jose Luiz Stape, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Background/Question/Methods

For decades, Eucalyptus sp. have been considered as candidates for use in managed forests in the southeastern United States.  However, efforts have largely been stymied by periodic severe cold damage of experimental plantations; the result is that the only commercially grown Eucalyptus is in middle to southern Florida.  In small plantings, Eucalyptus benthamii growing in Raleigh, N.C., survived the winter of 2010/11 (relatively cold) and survived and even grew throughout the winter of 2011/12 (relatively warm).  Our interest is in assessing the growth, carbon gain, and cold tolerance of E. benthamii in a replicated study planted in the spring of 2012 on a site near Raleigh, NC (35° 36’ N, 77° 56’ W).  Growth was measured after 6 months, and every two weeks starting in December 2012.  Gas exchange (Amax) was measured at least once per month starting in November 2012.  Photosynthetic Aci and light curves were measured quarterly. Cold tolerance, using the electrolyte leakage method, was measured several times during the winter and spring. Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), a species well adapted to the region, was also measured in adjacent plots representing an adapted “control” species.

Results/Conclusions

In October, 2013, six months after planting, mean height was 125.37 cm (S.E. = 14.32) and 58 cm (1.71 ) for E. benthamii and loblolly pine, respectively.  As of mid-February, the winter of 2012/13 has been moderate with temperatures on two nights down to -8° C, and ample days with temperatures in the low to mid-teens.    Amax (µmol m2 s-1) of E. benthamii was 15.31, (S.E. = 0.89), 11.27 (0.97), 1.77 (0.43) and 7.77 (1.82) on 12/16 (previous night temp: 3.9°C), 12/12 (11.27°C), 1/23 (-7.8°C) and 1/29 (6.7°C), respectively.  Amax of pine was 8.86, 5.24, 0.17, and 1.82 on the same dates, respectively. In December, loblolly pine shoots were more cold tolerant than E. benthamii, though mature foliage from the two species had indistinguishable and marginal cold hardiness levels (damage estimated at +/- -12°C). However, after a January frost, foliage of E. benthamii showed signs of freezing damage on shoot tips, whereas none was evident on loblolly pine.  E. benthamii may have the capacity to survive winter severity in the Piedmont of North Carolina, but winter growth is dependent on both the depth of cold tolerance and low temperatures as well as the ambient daily mean temperatures.