COS 7-6
Eavesdropping in plants: Delayed germination via biochemical recognition

Monday, August 5, 2013: 3:20 PM
101H, Minneapolis Convention Center
Ian J. Renne, Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH
Brandon T. Sinn, Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Gregory W. Shook Jr., Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH
David M. Sedlacko, Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH
Jessica R. Dull, Biological Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH
Diego Villarreal, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Argentina
José L. Hierro, CONICET and Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Argentina
Background/Question/Methods

Allelopathy has traditionally been viewed as phytotoxic disruption of recipient plant metabolism and allelopathic effects are generally strongest on species lacking historic exposure to particular phytotoxins (Novel Weapons Hypothesis).  However, mounting evidence suggests phytochemical-induced germination inhibition can be an adaptive response to competitive conditions and not a consequence of toxin exposure.  That is, selective advantages can exist for seeds to chemically recognize potential competitor presence and defer germination until better conditions for establishment occur.  This Biochemical Recognition Hypothesis (BRH, sensu Renne et al. 2004) contrasts the allelopathy paradigm by predicting greater germination inhibition following phytochemical exposure of sympatric compared to allopatric species.  In a greenhouse, we grew 12 species native to Argentinean and North American grasslands and tested whether phytochemical leachates from co-occurring species reduced seedling emergence more than those having no historic association. 

Results/Conclusions

Two species had 13% and 27% emergence reductions following leachate exposure of sympatric relative to allopatric species (p≤0.010), supporting species-specific BR.  Intraspecific leachates reduced emergence more than those from heterospecifics (p=0.020), suggesting within-species BR may be common.  Only the four smallest seeded species exhibited BR responses (Mann-Whitney U: p=0.007), suggesting selection for assessing local competition potential may intensify as seed reserves decline.  Importantly, leachate origin did not affect seedling biomass nor accelerate germination, indicating a non-toxic biochemical effect on germination percentage but not growth.  These findings suggest sympatric association may contribute to evolution of species-specific BR and that seed traits are likely important in development of these systems.  The underlying mechanism may be simple phytochemical-induced hormonal regulation.  We discuss factors that prohibit BR from being ubiquitous and the community structure implications of BR where it is predicted.  Lastly, allelopathy may be erroneously invoked when phytochemical-induced germination reduction occurs but a toxicity mechanism has not been elucidated.  In many cases, this fits more with the BRH than classic allelopathy.