COS 22-8
Methane emissions from upland trees

Tuesday, August 11, 2015: 10:30 AM
320, Baltimore Convention Center
Scott Pitz, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
James P. Megonigal, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD
Katalin Szlavecz, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Most work on methane (CH4) emissions from natural ecosystems has focused on wetlands and wetland soils because they are predictable emitters and relatively simple to quantify. Less attention has been directed toward upland ecosystems that cover far larger areas, but are assumed to be too dry to emit CH4. There is abundant evidence that upland ecosystems emit small amounts of CH4 during hot moments that collectively constitute a significant source in the global budget of this potent greenhouse gas. Almost no attention has been given to trees and woody plants as significant sources of CH4 in upland forests.  Tree’s root systems integrate far larger range of soil conditions than are typically measured at the surface.  Trees’ roots can extend to soil depths and moistures where abundant anoxic microsites can develop. These sites can produce CH4 that could enter woody plant tissue.  To address these facts we asked the following questions:

  • Do upland trees release CH4 to the atmosphere?
  • What are the controlling factors that determine the size and timing of upland tree CH4 fluxes?

We have established a plot of upland trees in a research forest near Annapolis, Maryland. Both tree and soil CH4 fluxes were measured using chamber methods with cavity ring down spectrometer. Each tree chamber was custom fit to the stem near the base.  Near the plot, we also established an automated stem flux measurement system, allowing us to make high frequency measurements of fluxes at different heights and determine the drivers.


Upland emissions from the tree stems averaged +25 ug CH4 m-2 hr-1 while the soil uptake was -72 ug CH4 m-2 hr-1. Some stem emissions were over +200 ug CH4 m-2 hr-1. With one exception, all trees that were emitting CH4 from the stems, were growing in soils that were net consumers of CH4.  Factors controlling CH4 emissions were soil moisture and Julian day. 

The automated system showed fluxes followed a clear diurnal pattern and the magnitude of the fluxes decreased with height.  These diurnal patterns peaked at midday and seem to be driven by transpiration.  In addition, different species had similar magnitude of fluxes but the amplitude of diurnal patterns differed, indicating that species morphology may play a large role as a driver. Future CH4 budgets and climate models will need to include tree fluxes and their drivers for accurate accounting and predictions.