OOS 18-8 - Legacies from extreme drought increase ecosystem sensitivity to future climate extremes

Wednesday, August 10, 2016: 10:10 AM
Grand Floridian Blrm F, Ft Lauderdale Convention Center
Melinda D. Smith, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, Alan K. Knapp, Department of Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, David L. Hoover, Southwest Biological Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Moab, UT, Meghan L. Avolio, National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, MD, Andrew Felton, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO and Kevin R. Wilcox, Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

Climate extremes, such as drought, are increasing in frequency and intensity, and the economic and ecological consequences of these extreme events can be substantial and widespread. Although there is still much to be learned about how ecosystems will respond to an intensification of drought, even less is known about the factors that determine post-drought recovery of ecosystem function. Such knowledge is particularly important because post-drought recovery periods can be protracted depending on the extent to which key plant populations, community structure and biogeochemical processes are affected. These drought legacies may alter ecosystem function for many years post-drought and may impact future sensitivity to climate extremes. To address these issues, we experimentally imposed two extreme growing season drought events in a central US grassland to assess the impacts of repeated droughts on ecosystem response and recovery dynamics.


The first extreme drought (with growing season precipitation totals lower than the driest two year period of the 1930s US Dust Bowl) reduced aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) below the lowest level measured in this grassland for almost thirty years. The extreme reduction in ecosystem function with the first two-year drought was a consequence of reduced productivity of the two dominant functional groups in this grassland – C4 grasses and C3 forbs. However, the most abundant (dominant) C3 forb was negatively impacted by the drought more than the dominant C4 grass. This differential sensitivity led to a reordering of species abundances within the plant community. Yet, despite this large shift in plant community composition, which persisted post-drought, ANPP recovered completely the year after drought. This rapid recovery in function was due to a rapid demographic response by the dominant C4 grass, which compensated for loss of the dominant C3 forb. Because of this shift in composition to greater C4 grass dominance, we expected that the second drought would have a greater impact on ecosystem function of plots that had not experienced drought. However, contrary to these expectations, previously droughted plots were more sensitive to drought than those plots that had not experienced drought. Thus, the legacy of drought (shift in community composition) made this grassland more sensitive to subsequent drought. Overall, our results suggest that low resistance of ecosystem function to an extreme climatic event does not preclude rapid ecosystem recovery. Yet, despite rapid recovery from drought, legacies of drought increase sensitivity to future extreme events.