A transparent framework for making optimal decisions based on clear objectives is a defensible and compelling process for natural resource management decisions, which often combine information from ecological sciences with sometimes conflicting human perceptions and values. Decision Analysis (DA) provides such a framework and is also a venue for communication among stakeholders (those with a vested interest in the outcome of a decision). We provide examples of successful management outcomes using DA processes: predator management in Alaska and setting continent-wide waterfowl harvest regulation. We then highlight perceived barriers to implementation of DA by agencies, including appropriate management of uncertainty, and lack of familiarity with DA concepts such as problem framing, setting objectives, rapid prototyping, and engaging stakeholders.
Results/Conclusions
Given increasing complexity of natural resource management challenges, current resource managers and scientists who supply information to them should train in and use DA for more efficient and collaborative decisions, even and especially with conflicting objectives. To reduce barriers to implementation over time, we conclude that DA should be routinely taught within undergraduate and graduate ecology, wildlife biology, and natural resource management programs.