PS 16-104 - Artificial oyster reef fish and bivalve usage compared to off reef and natural reef sites in the Chesapeake Bay

Tuesday, August 9, 2016
ESA Exhibit Hall, Ft Lauderdale Convention Center
Keith D. Johnson, Stevenson University, Stevenson, MD, Mark Moody, Biological Sciences, Stevenson University, Stevenson, MD and Bethany P. Liberto, Biology, Stevenson University, Stevenson, MD
Background/Question/Methods

Restoration of habitats in the Chesapeake Bay has been occurring for many years and the benefits can be seen for numerous organisms in the area. Reef balls have been used to create hard substrate in estuaries that bivalves can settle on and establish new reefs. These structures are also three dimensional and offer refuge for fish as well as a potential food source as the reef becomes a living habitat. The type of bivalves and fish, as well as their size and abundance that can be found using the artificial reef can be important for future restoration projects and determination of ecosystem services that can be gained from similar projects. We have completed some experiments and will continue to collect data on the fish and bivalve usage of these artificially created reefs. We have done this at various times during a few summers to look at temporal changes over seasons. We also are comparing our data to Maryland Department of Natural Resources data for this site and a nearby natural reef. This was done on the reef structure as well as nearby adjacent areas with similar conditions.

Results/Conclusions

We found that we had a much higher catch per minute rate on the reef than off the reef. We did find that the fish caught off the reef were on average a little larger (by species) than the fish caught on the reef. From the data collected during this experiment, we can conclude that fish are more abundant on the artificial reef structure and that white perch (Morone americana) are the most abundant of the species that are recreationally caught by hook and line both on and off the reef in this area. We then compared this data with a nearby natural reef and could see that the species and sizes found were similar but the catch rates were not as high on the artificial reef as they were on the natural reef. We also found that there were differences in the types and abundance of bivalves at the different sites. There were more clams in the off reef (mud bottom) site, more mussels on the rubble and reef ball site, and more oysters on the natural reef site.