Wednesday, August 8, 2007 - 3:20 PM

COS 80-6: Annual plant productivity as a function of species richness, diversity, and evenness over 17 years of rainfall variability in a Chilean semiarid shrubland

Aurora Gaxiola1, Martin Carmona1, M. Francisca Diaz2, Peter L. Meserve3, Douglas A. Kelt4, Juan J. Armesto5, and Julio R. Gutierrez6. (1) Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB), Universidad de Chile & P. Universidad Católica de Chile, (2) Center for Advanced Studies in Ecology and Biodiversity, P. Universidad Católica de Chile, (3) Northern Illinois University, (4) University of California, (5) P. Universidad Catolica de Chile, (6) Universidad de Chile

Over the past decade, studies in grasslands have assessed the relationship between species richness and biomass or productivity; however, these studies have produced contradicting conclusions. Often primary productivity and richness are strongly correlated, but weak or absent relationships have also been found. It could be possible that the strength of response that productivity and diversity have to common limiting resources differ, resulting in conflicting results. Similarly, few studies addressed the effects of diversity (H´) and evenness (J´) on productivity and these relationships could be relevant to explaining the functional role of diversity. Here, we tested the predictive effects of S, H´ and J´ on annual plant productivity in a Chilean semiarid shrubland, using a 17-year database (1989-2005) of annual plant cover (CA), collected in four 70m x 70 m plots. In this ecosystem, soil water and nutrient availabilities are modulated by strong interannual fluctuations in rainfall driven by El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Over the 17 years of data, rainfall varied between 11 (1998) and 356 mm (2002). In the same period, CA ranged from 28.6±6.4 (mean±1SE) to 421.8±20.1 m2 and annual species richness ranged from 9 to 33 species. Plant productivity, estimated from cover, showed a positive relationship with H´, J´ and S. Similarly, these parameters increased with increasing rainfall. However, comparison of regression slopes showed that productivity increased 34% slower as a function of S than J´. We show that species richness alone was not the best predictor of ecosystem productivity. We argue that other components of diversity, species abundance and evenness, should be considered when evaluating the role of species on ecosystem function.

See more of COS 80 - Biodiversity and ecosystem function II
See more of Contributed Oral and Poster Abstracts

See more of The ESA/SER Joint Meeting (August 5 -- August 10, 2007)