Wednesday, August 4, 2010: 1:30 PM-5:00 PM | |||
303-304, David L Lawrence Convention Center | |||
OOS 31 - From Microbial to Conservation Biology: Exploring Phylogenetic Beta Diversity as a Theoretical Tool Uniting Disciplines | |||
Beta diversity, which measures how species composition changes across geographic space and/or environmental gradients, has long been considered an important measure for quantifying biodiversity patterns and determining mechanisms that influence these patterns. Further, complementarity, which is essentially a measure of beta diversity, serves as the conceptual basis for systematic reserve design. Recently, beta diversity has been extended to include information on species relatedness (i.e., phylogenetic beta diversity, PBD) in three relatively distinct fields. Ecologists who study macro-organisms have started to quantify phylogenetic relatedness among assemblages to better evaluate how environmental gradients and geographic barriers influence biodiversity patterns (e.g., Graham & Fine. 2008. PBD: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. Ecol. Letters 12:1265-1277). At the same time, microbial biologists have embraced PBD, since information on relatedness but not species demarcation is readily available from the ribosomal RNA sequences that are typically used in microbial diversity assessment (e.g., Lozupone & Knight. 2005. Unifrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Envrionm Microbiol 71:8228-35). Finally, conservation biologists have extended organismal based reserve design algorithms to include phylogenetic information (e.g., Ferrier et al. 2007. Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyze and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment. Div and Dist, 13: 252-264) in an attempt to conserve both our taxonomic and evolutionary heritage, currently and in the face of climate change. An increasing number of methodological advances and case studies are underway, in each field showing that PBD can provide new insight on mechanisms influencing biodiversity. Nonetheless, there has been limited collaboration, or even cross-citation, among these different fields. To this end we propose to bring together a diverse set of ecologists, microbiologists and conservation biologists to explore phylogenetic beta diversity, its uses, limitations and future potential as a research and conservation tool. | |||
Organizer: | Catherine H. Graham, Stony Brook University | ||
Co-organizers: | Catherine Lozupone, University of Colorado - Boulder Daniel Faith, Australian Museum | ||
Moderator: | Catherine H. Graham, Stony Brook University | ||
1:30 PM | OOS 31-1 | Modeling the spatial distribution of phylogenies Hélène Morlon, University of California - Berkeley, Brendan J. M. Bohannan, University of Oregon, Jessica L. Green, University of Oregon, Joshua B. Plotkin, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Matthew Potts, University of California, Berkeley | |
1:50 PM | OOS 31-2 | Comparing phylogenetic and taxonomic beta diversity in Andean hummingbirds Juan Parra, Stony Brook University, Catherine Graham, Stony Brook University, Jim McGuire, University of California - Berkeley, Carsten Rahbek, University of Copenhagen | |
2:10 PM | OOS 31-3 | Inferring community assembly processes from phylogenetic, functional and taxonomic β-diversity James C. Stegen, University of North Carolina, Allen H. Hurlbert, University of North Carolina | |
2:30 PM | OOS 31-4 | Exploring bacterial community assemblage patterns in disease vectors using pyrosequencing and phylogenetic analyses Ryan Thomas Jones, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | |
2:50 PM | OOS 31-5 | Using phylogenetic β diversity measures to understand the factors structuring microbial diversity over large and fine scales Catherine Lozupone, University of Colorado, Rob Knight, University of Colorado | |
3:10 PM | Break | ||
3:20 PM | OOS 31-6 | Using beta diversity to study the influence of geographic proximity and habitat type on the composition of marine microbial communities Donovan H. Parks, Dalhousie University, Robert G. Beiko, Dalhousie University | |
3:40 PM | OOS 31-7 | Determinants of community structure along climatic gradients: Insights from patterns of phylogenetic β diversity Jean-Philippe Lessard, University of Tennessee, Michael Krabbe Borregaard, University of Copenhagen, James A. Fordyce, University of Tennessee, Susanne Fritz, University of Copenhagen, Michael D. Weiser, North Carolina State University, Robert Dunn, NCSU, Nathan J. Sanders, University of Tennessee, Carsten Rahbek, University of Copenhagen | |
4:00 PM | OOS 31-8 | Phylogenetic beta diversity as a tool in biodiversity conservation and monitoring Daniel Faith, Australian Museum, Simon Ferrier, CSIRO, Dan Rosauer, CSIRO | |
4:20 PM | OOS 31-9 | Soil bacterial diversity in the Arctic is not fundamentally different from other biomes Haiyan Chu, Queen's University, Noah Fierer, University of Colorado at Boulder, Christian Lauber, University of Colorado at Boulder, J. Gregory Caporaso, University of Colorado, Rob Knight, University of Colorado, Paul Grogan, Queen's University | |
4:40 PM | OOS 31-10 | Inferring the shapes of species ranges from distance-decay relationships Joshua Ladau, Gladstone Institutes, Jessica L. Green, University of Oregon, Katherine S. Pollard, Gladstone Institutes |
See more of Organized Oral Session
See more of The 95th ESA Annual Meeting (August 1 -- 6, 2010)