PS 9-91
Do increased N inputs influence rates of soil N cycling in high-elevation red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) forests along a gradient of atmospheric deposition?

Monday, August 5, 2013
Exhibit Hall B, Minneapolis Convention Center
Justin M. Mathias, Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Kenneth R. Smith, Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Brenden E. McNeil, Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
William T. Peterjohn, Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Richard B. Thomas, Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
Background/Question/Methods

Elevated rates of atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition can alleviate plant growth restrictions in N-limited forests by increasing available N. However, sustained high rates of N deposition can induce N saturation whereby N inputs exceed biological demand and lead to elevated N losses. Forests receiving elevated N inputs often exhibit a wide variation in rates of N retention. This suggests that factors other than N deposition can strongly influence rates of N availability and loss in forested ecosystems. In this study, we established seven plots in high-elevation red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) forests along a gradient of atmospheric N deposition in order to assess whether variations in N input correspond to N cycling rates. During September 2012, we collected soil samples that were incubated for 28 d and periodically harvested to determine changes in NH4+ and NO3- pools. We calculated rates of net nitrification and N mineralization as the change in NO3- and total inorganic N content (NH4+ and NO3-), respectively, after a given time interval per g of dry soil. A small subsample of soils was destructively harvested to measure total C, N, and d15N content.

Results/Conclusions

The results of our study indicate that modeled values of atmospheric N deposition did not correspond to rates of either mineralization (R2 = 0.02, p = 0.76) or nitrification (R2 = 0.01, p = 0.83). These soil N transformations were, however, well-correlated with other measured indices of N availability. Mineralization significantly declined with increased soil C:N in both the organic (R2 = 0.70, p = 0.02) and mineral horizons (R2 = 0.83, p = 0.01). We observed similar declines in net nitrification as soil C:N increased in the organic (R2 = 0.64, p = 0.03) and mineral horizons (R2 = 0.67, p = 0.02). This trend was also observed for N transformations and soil d15N content, but was not as significant. While modeled rates of N deposition were not well-correlated with rates of soil N transformations, the results from our laboratory incubation validate field-based estimates of N availability. This suggests that although N deposition may have been historically high in this region, current N availability is likely being driven by other factors such as the relative abundance of hardwood species.