OOS 82-10
Carbon flux and biological monitoring at the Baltimore Cub Hill flux tower: Partitioning the role of land use, carbon emissions and respiration

Friday, August 14, 2015: 11:10 AM
310, Baltimore Convention Center
John Hom, USDA Forest Service
Nicanor Saliendra, ARS, USDA
Matthew Patterson, USDA Forest Service
Ian D. Yesilonis, USDA Forest Service, Baltimore, MD
Rodrigo Vargas, Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Kenneth L. Clark, Silas Little Experimental Forest, USDA Forest Service, New Lisbon, NJ
Leonard Bielory, Rutgers University

Carbon flux measurements and carbon dioxide concentrations were taken along an urban to rural gradient from Cub Hill in Baltimore, Maryland (CH), Elk Neck, Maryland (EN) to the Silas Little Experimental Forest (SLEF) in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. These sites incorporate heavily vegetated urban and rural forests. We obtained net ecosystem exchange (NEE) values stratified according to wind direction from areas of different vegetation cover and land use composition.  Urban forest benefits and ecological services, primarily carbon sequestration are discussed.  


Carbon flux estimates were closely correlated with the percent vegetation cover estimated from remote sensing. Annual net CO2 exchange at the Baltimore flux site indicated that this site was a net source from, due to high CO2 emissions from fossil fuel energy use as well as leaf off from the deciduous trees during the domant seasons. We estimated the anthropogenic CO2 emissions in suburban Baltimore by comparing the eddy fluxes in rural forest in New Jersey (SLEF) and with a mobile tower at Elk Neck (EN) for the background biogenic CO2 flux.   Despite the large emissions around this urban tower, CH showed higher C uptake during the growing season than SLEF due to the high vegetation cover surrounding the tower. Soil respiration studies in maintained lawns compared to forest floor plots indicated that there was considerable night time respiration from lawns that coincided with the seasonality and magnitude observed in the growing season NEE.  This study supports management and policy use of urban forest for ecological benefits, such as urban canopy tree cover initiatives to offset carbon dioxide, reduce emissions , and lower land surface temperatures.